Timeline for How can i prevent a raging moderator from blocking my questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/ with https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 13, 2017 at 19:17 | comment | added | user2186597 | you reversed the conclusion. If the community doesn't want the answer opened, there is not much the author can do. In this case, gathering the 5 votes to counter the trolls were not gathered. I don't have any more questions, there are other websites without those problems. | |
| Feb 13, 2017 at 19:01 | comment | added | Monica Cellio Mod | @user2186597 one of your questions was automatically deleted as abandoned. Putting a question on hold is to allow time for editing and reopening; that didn't happen in this case, so eventually the question was auto-deleted. But the goal of putting a question on hold is unchanged: we want to get them improved and reopened. If the author doesn't want to help, though, then often there's not much the community can do. If you have questions about what's needed please ask; people here are willing to help. | |
| Feb 13, 2017 at 15:30 | comment | added | user2186597 | "Your questions have not been deleted". 5 days later... "Oh, yeah, my mistake, yes they have been deleted". | |
| Feb 12, 2017 at 23:13 | answer | added | Mołot | timeline score: 18 | |
| Feb 8, 2017 at 18:54 | answer | added | James | timeline score: 27 | |
| Feb 8, 2017 at 18:32 | comment | added | DaaaahWhoosh | @user2186597 your questions have not been deleted, they have been put on hold so they can be improved. Just because you think your questions are good doesn't mean they're a good fit for this site, and that decision comes down to the people who've been here longer than you. If you'd like to know what kinds of questions are acceptable here, and why your questions were closed, please ask, but don't just assume we're persecuting you for petty reasons. | |
| Feb 8, 2017 at 18:21 | comment | added | user2186597 | i am quitting this site, it is obviously, the situation will never get fixed, this questions are already marked for deletion by the moderators, nothing can change that. The past doesn't reflect the present situation, the second question was open for 2 days, and they decided to close it down once i changed the accepted question. The new question is even blocked for more obsece reasons, blocked because it refers to a period where christianity started. If i didn't mention the word Jesus, the question will have passed with flying colours. It is clear censorship. | |
| Feb 8, 2017 at 18:17 | comment | added | HDE 226868 Mod | Only one person wrote answers to either of those questions voted to put a question of yours on hold, and that close vote was only on one of the questions. Please consider that you may be in the wrong before throwing accusations around. | |
| Feb 8, 2017 at 18:05 | comment | added | DaaaahWhoosh | Oh wait, I missed one. 3 of your 5 questions are on hold, over a period of two days. Which means you had one question out of three on hold before this 'raging moderator' incident started. | |
| Feb 8, 2017 at 17:53 | comment | added | DaaaahWhoosh | There were a total of eight people who voted to close those two questions, and those two are the only questions of yours on hold. If you disagree with the closure, this is the right place to bring it up, but please don't just assume you're right and being unfairly persecuted, it makes people much less likely to take you seriously. | |
| Feb 8, 2017 at 17:49 | comment | added | PatJ | @MonicaCellio I really think we need to make those on-hold markers friendlier, let people understand it's in no way punitive. | |
| Feb 8, 2017 at 17:48 | comment | added | PatJ | The community is, as much as possible, self-moderated through consensus. Your questions got locked because most people believe they do not fit the requirements of the site. There is no personal vendetta here. Maybe we should better explain our decisions though. | |
| Feb 8, 2017 at 17:31 | comment | added | Monica Cellio Mod | What are you talking about? I don't see any moderator participation on either question. Not a single diamond in evidence anywhere. I didn't read all the comments, but I don't see any obvious "raging" either. | |
| Feb 8, 2017 at 17:25 | history | asked | user2186597 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |