Revision #4 is what was put on hold. Take another look at that question.

Note, in particular, these comments:

You wouldn't be able to create such high velocities in non vacuum conditions. – sphennings (link)

 

If your question requires watching two videos, reading one linked external article and googling for second one, then it is a bad question. Both questions and answers are supposed to be as self-contained as possible. – Mołot (link)

I agree with Molot's comment. I didn't watch the videos and read the links, and I couldn't tell what you were trying to ask. It had four close votes when I saw that, so I cast the fifth.

There's also the gratuitous Hitler stuff, which as I noted was attracting flags.

You've now edited the question to focus it more, which is good. I see it has one reopen vote already. If it's now clear to the people who know more physics than I do, it should gather more such votes.

That is, assuming people aren't turned off by the attitude displayed in your meta post, especially the first version. It's ok to disagree with other users and good to seek clarification when you're confused about why something happened, but you'll always get better results if you approach it in the spirit of cooperation and with a little humility.

Revision #4 is what was put on hold. Take another look at that question.

Note, in particular, these comments:

You wouldn't be able to create such high velocities in non vacuum conditions. – sphennings (link)

If your question requires watching two videos, reading one linked external article and googling for second one, then it is a bad question. Both questions and answers are supposed to be as self-contained as possible. – Mołot (link)

I agree with Molot's comment. I didn't watch the videos and read the links, and I couldn't tell what you were trying to ask. It had four close votes when I saw that, so I cast the fifth.

There's also the gratuitous Hitler stuff, which as I noted was attracting flags.

You've now edited the question to focus it more, which is good. I see it has one reopen vote already. If it's now clear to the people who know more physics than I do, it should gather more such votes.

That is, assuming people aren't turned off by the attitude displayed in your meta post, especially the first version. It's ok to disagree with other users and good to seek clarification when you're confused about why something happened, but you'll always get better results if you approach it in the spirit of cooperation and with a little humility.