**Part three of the [case study series][1].**

[Part 1 - Tim B][2]

[Part 2 - Daaaah Whoosh][3]

----

**I submit the following for review.**


http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/18414/what-single-element-could-destroy-the-world

**About world building?**
Insofar as destroying worlds is about world building yes, I believe this is on topic.  My major gripe with this question was actually some of the answers it attracted.  Many of the answers failed to take the premise of a mad scientist into account.  This led to some modifications of the restrictions that I placed around the situation.  I didn't feel that some of them should have been necessary but if you're not specific around here people tend to go for outlandish.

**Risking off-topic?**

No, this question seems pretty strait forward on topic to me.  If anything you could probably claim it is idea generation but I think the restrictions put in place make it clear I am looking for someone with chemistry/physics knowledge to fill in the gaps.

----
http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/9717/how-would-space-battles-alter-combat-tactics

**About world building?**
This question helps define combat in space, so in my mind is a discussion of how things differ from the combat we are used to today.  Feels pretty on-topic, discussion of a system and how it impacts the world.

**Risking off-topic?**  Nope, I am happy this one is well within scope.

----
http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/527/what-are-the-primary-triggers-for-the-degrading-and-fall-of-great-empires

**About world building?**  Yes this is about world building, specifically developing a history for the world in question.  

**Risking off-topic?**  I think it is probably too broad.  We went back and forth on this question several times.  It was an early question on the site so I can't recall exactly, but I think it was closed once or twice.  This question would probably have benefited from the sandbox but I don't think it had been created yet.  It could probably be reworked to be more on topic, I'm just not sure how.

----
http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/10102/how-would-multi-race-humanoid-evolution-happen

**About world building?**  Absolutely.  

**Risking off-topic?**  Not at all.  This one is nice and clean.

----
http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/7301/how-to-explain-the-co-existence-of-peace-and-violence-in-religion

**About world building?**  Yes, the goal of this question was to help illuminate how this process works so it can be included in the world as a source of conflict throughout history etc.

**Risking off-topic?**  It feels on topic to me but there could be an argument that this is a plot idea.  I think the question is effectively framed as looking at the system though so it should be good.

  [1]: http://meta.worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/3048/case-study-series
  [2]: http://meta.worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/3043/case-studies-on-or-off-topic
  [3]: http://meta.worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/3063/case-study-2-daaaah-whoosh