So. This question was pretty extensively discussed yesterday and was significantly tailored from its original form. At one point it had 3 close votes, then after some work went down to two.
I fail to see how this is too broad at this point. It has a defined answer, currently the highest voted answer is what I am looking for, but that does not mean a better answer is not out there. The nature of world-building is that there is usually not going to be a single correct answer.
I fear that either a) people are voting to close things without effectively reviewing them because they already have a couple votes (the first two votes were in before any of the edits were made yesterday), or b) people see religion in the title and automatically think its not answerable.
None of the last three to vote commented, which means the poster (me in this case) does not know their concerns with the post. That's bad form, I understand it is not required but when time has been taken to review and edit a post it is very helpful.
If you truly think this requires some additional attention please advise on why.
Not that I am biased or anything but I think this should be reopened.
For the sake of comparison: What could humans do to render the earth uninhabitable? How is this not more opinion based and broad than my question?
This hopefully illustrates why I am concerned that we may be looking at a situation where close votes snowball once one is cast and we are inconsistent with what we do and do not close.