2
$\begingroup$

The recently-created tag is applied to only one question so far. However, it seems it me to be fairly meta: all I can tell from this tag is that there is somehow a fortress involved in the questions: not who lives there, what is happening to it, or how it's built; not how it relates to the world in question or the question in the world.

What do we think? Is it necessary? Its easy enough to clean it up if we decide we don't now, just removing it from the question will see it automatically deleted.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Might be better as fortification? $\endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Feb 3 '15 at 15:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @TimB I don't think we need it at all $\endgroup$
    – ArtOfCode
    Feb 3 '15 at 15:25
  • $\begingroup$ Seems a little too specific, surely it will almost never be used? does the defeat the point of tags? $\endgroup$
    – Jack.Ramsden
    Feb 3 '15 at 15:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The tag is ok by itself but the question doesn't need that tag. $\endgroup$
    – Vincent
    Feb 3 '15 at 16:02
1
$\begingroup$

I don't think we need it. We already have and , which used together say "fortress/fortifications" to me -- though in the case of this question its "fort-ness" isn't obviously central anyway. If a body of questions develops then the tag's unique properties should become apparent, at which point they can be captured in a tag wiki.

$\endgroup$
2

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .