4
$\begingroup$

In some contexts like sites where people with a common interest (hey, exactly like wb.se.com! ) it could happen that the people there wants to gather together around shared projects.

While wb.se.com is not a place for people to meet, but for questions to be resolved, should we make our community feeling stronger by providing means for people to directly help other people in their projects?

e.g. somebody building a world needs some help with vulcanism, and makes several questions here, all answered by the same geology expert. It would make sense for them to collaborate directly. Should we encourage that? Maybe via our chat?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Is it really a matter of encouraging? It either happens or it doesn't and it's up to one of the two people to say to move to chat. $\endgroup$ – Tim B Sep 20 '14 at 15:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I thought about something similar to this (a project the whole site works on as a community), but decided that SE isn't good for that kind of thing. $\endgroup$ – DonyorM Sep 21 '14 at 2:38
5
$\begingroup$

No, we shouldn't.

Stack Exchange isn't a social network; it's a questions and answers network.

Now, if I was an expert in geology with specialization toward volcanoes, and saw multiple questions tagged in a short period of time, I might get curious and look more closely at that tag thinking that maybe there is more there which I can answer relatively easily.

Same with any other subject.

But we shouldn't expect people to do that. Every user picks which questions they want to answer, and to what level they want to take their answer, based on their own feelings, available time, and knowledge. I know I have been rather annoyed when people have taken my answering one of their questions as some sort of carte blanche to ask me specifically to answer their other questions as well.

Also, for your specific suggestion of chat: generally speaking, chat is a terrible way of doing Q&A. It comes down to largely the same issues that make the Stack Exchange Q&A format better than forums (or Facebook) for getting specific answers to specific questions. If someone is willing to discuss a question through chat then by all means, but those discussions should focus on asking the best question possible. The answer should be posted on the question itself. That allows the community to chime in and vote, potentially much later, and preserves knowledge in an easy-to-find form for later.

(I have started out in chat a few times trying to figure out basically where to start asking a question, and what information should go into the question, when I wasn't sure how to approach a problem. But I have always made it clear up front that the intention is to post a question rather than seeking actual answers in chat. That also means that people not intimitely familiar with the subject matter might be able to help out in chat, as asking a good question is a skill that transfers between subject matter domains.)

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .