15
$\begingroup$

There is a post on Meta.Stackexchange stating that it is now possible for SE sites to enable a banner that states that AI content is banned or must be cited.

Since AI Content is banned on Worldbuilding Stackexchange, do we want to enable the banner stating that AI content is banned on Worldbuildiing.Stackexchange.com, similar to the image below?

enter image description here

If you want the banner, upvote the YES answer below.

If you don't want the banner, upvote the NO answer below.

In case you want to explain the yes/no, leave a comment under the answer.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ How commonly are AI answers showing in the report queue? I can't say I've encountered them much but that may very well just have been diligent moderating (for which you are greatly appreciated). $\endgroup$
    – KeizerHarm
    Jan 22 at 20:25
  • $\begingroup$ @KeizerHarm We've handled a few. I've had to ban a user who spammed AI answers. It happens... and it gets dealt with. $\endgroup$
    – Monty Wild Mod
    Jan 23 at 1:40
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I really wish they made the banner red. I honestly didn't get that that is the banner until ploughing through several links looking for images and finally expanding one. Light blue is NOT a warning colour. But yes, we should implement. $\endgroup$
    – elemtilas
    Jan 24 at 3:13

2 Answers 2

35
$\begingroup$

YES, I want the banner as explained in the question.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ 119 views and 8 votes between the answers. Is it possible to know how many of those views were actual users vs. Google-esque bots? I miss the community ads. I'm convinced they increased participation. $\endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 24 at 18:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JBH the views don't correspond to individual users, either. Single user can generate more than one view. $\endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    Jan 24 at 18:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @VLAZ Thanks! And that just makes everything worse. It's really a shame that participation in Meta has dropped so much. $\endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 24 at 21:14
  • $\begingroup$ I'm a frequent user of GPT 4 turbo, which is still in beta. It is damned good, but it is not good enough to be used to answer questions that require critical thinking and careful consideration. It is my sincere belief that A.I. generated content should be banned. I vote "YES", with the reservation, that it should be permissible to use A.I. as a tool, e.g. help translating an answer or a question that a user has written in their native language. $\endgroup$ Feb 12 at 0:26
  • $\begingroup$ @JBH it's not exactly participation, but can be random users, sometimes from completely other sites who have not enough context or good enough stack of pros and cons to immediately vote here. $\endgroup$
    – halt9k
    Feb 14 at 10:35
-1
$\begingroup$

NO, I don't want the banner as explained in the question.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .