Timeline for Should the Science-Based tag demand (similar to Hard-Science) that all world rules adhere to real-life science?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2022 at 22:07 | comment | added | JBH | I'd love one! Especially if it could be the red only-moderators-can-use-it variety. But it's likely a low priority. | |
| Jul 18, 2022 at 21:51 | comment | added | Mike Serfas | That's better. I wonder if Meta should have an "obsolete" tag. | |
| Jul 17, 2022 at 23:28 | comment | added | JBH | Fair enough. I can make it more clear and propagate it to the many now obsolete questions. | |
| Jul 17, 2022 at 23:19 | comment | added | Mike Serfas | Sorry, but when I look at it, even now, that seems to be suggesting the new text had these problems which needed to be considered. I suppose if I'd looked at the posting date and the date mentioned in the first sentence I could have logicked it out, but ... not the clearest way to close a thread. | |
| Jul 17, 2022 at 23:15 | comment | added | JBH | This one is marked. The very first line of the post. | |
| Jul 17, 2022 at 23:13 | comment | added | Mike Serfas | I saw this at the top of the list. I can't say I was watching for policy changes. Are threads closed or otherwise marked on Meta if they aren't taking answers? I should note though that I was speaking in favor of the text that currently appears when "science-based" in a rectangle is clicked. | |
| Jul 17, 2022 at 21:48 | comment | added | JBH | The language in what, Mike? This entire thread was made moot by the recent changes to the science-based, hard-science, science-fiction, reality-check, and internal-consistency tags. Why are you answering a now irrelevant question? | |
| Jul 16, 2022 at 19:38 | history | answered | Mike Serfas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |