Timeline for Debate on the relevance of law-related questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2021 at 18:23 | history | edited | KeizerHarm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 10:35 | comment | added | KeizerHarm | I moved my argument to its own answer. Also as a bump for the discussion because there has been surprisingly little response so far. | |
| Jan 18, 2021 at 10:35 | answer | added | KeizerHarm | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 18, 2021 at 10:09 | history | edited | KeizerHarm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2372 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2021 at 22:39 | comment | added | candied_orange | World building isn’t about science any more than it’s about law. We allow science questions as a check on how “realistic” the story sounds to experts on science. It should be the same with law. The difference between this site and legal sites is we don’t care if it is legal as much as we care what it would take to make it believably legal. | |
| Jan 13, 2021 at 21:33 | answer | added | user2352714 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 13, 2021 at 15:59 | history | edited | KeizerHarm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 254 characters in body
|
| Jan 13, 2021 at 3:20 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Jan 13, 2021 at 3:08 | answer | added | elemtilas | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 11, 2021 at 11:54 | history | edited | KeizerHarm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 102 characters in body
|
| Jan 11, 2021 at 11:47 | history | asked | KeizerHarm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |