Timeline for Should we delete answers that don't meet the requirements of the hard-science tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2017 at 19:43 | comment | added | user | Where are the downvotes? | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 0:25 | comment | added | Mazura | This isn't Skeptics (thank god). Use the DV button, people. | |
| Sep 6, 2016 at 19:06 | comment | added | SudoSedWinifred | Well, giving an incorrect response is certainly a failure to properly address the question. If you answer correctly but express yourself in such a sloppy fashion that few can determine the meaning of what you've said, you haven't answered correctly. But I'm just chiseling off a still-more minor piece of your minor quibble. ;) | |
| Sep 6, 2016 at 17:40 | comment | added | Ranger | Minor quibble, but the reason to downvote is slightly larger than you define: "Use your downvotes whenever you encounter an egregiously sloppy, no-effort-expended post, or an answer that is clearly and perhaps dangerously incorrect." Quibbles aside, I agree with the general point you made. | |
| Sep 4, 2016 at 15:50 | history | answered | SudoSedWinifred | CC BY-SA 3.0 |