Timeline for Is potentially offensive language welcome in our community?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2017 at 22:23 | answer | added | apaul | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 13, 2017 at 20:07 | history | edited | user |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 13, 2017 at 19:58 | answer | added | JDługoszMod | timeline score: -2 | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/ with https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 12, 2014 at 23:25 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie | @githubphagocyte Agreed! The only thing that it might make moot is dissenting opinions, I should probably have said. Affirming it right here is a good indicator of local community culture, yes. | |
| Oct 12, 2014 at 21:34 | comment | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | @SevenSidedDie certainly relevant enough for this question to be an extra route to it, but when needing to quote something quoting the be nice policy direct usually makes most sense. This ones's handy as a back up to show that our specific community also agrees. | |
| Oct 12, 2014 at 18:53 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie | This is working its way towards being the new policy on conduct at SE. As it covers (in)appropriate language in general and language that would alienate or make unwelcome whole categories of users in specific, it seems extremely relevant. Possibly relevant enough to make this question moot! | |
| Oct 9, 2014 at 12:28 | history | edited | Tim B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Oct 9, 2014 at 12:28 | comment | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | @Liath yes that was the opposite of my intention - thanks for editing it out of the title. | |
| Oct 9, 2014 at 11:58 | history | edited | Liath | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I've edited the word into the body rather than the title as this is now a "hot meta question"
|
| Oct 9, 2014 at 11:54 | comment | added | Liath | It's ironic that this has now made it onto the Hot Meta Posts and is therefore visible on every page... | |
| Oct 7, 2014 at 15:43 | comment | added | Jay Vogler | "s---" is not gender-specific... It added nothing to the answer, though. Carbon's promiscuity could easily have been referenced without it. | |
| Oct 6, 2014 at 19:26 | answer | added | Chad | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 5, 2014 at 21:37 | comment | added | CAgrippa | I agree that the analogy usage is problematic and unnecessary. The real problem is that "s---" is gender-specific, and thus implies the validity of an ugly gender stereotype. The [snip] edit strikes me as a good basic policing method. | |
| Oct 5, 2014 at 12:37 | comment | added | Tim B | I didn't down-vote the answer for it...but I very nearly did and fully agree with/support you doing so. | |
| Oct 5, 2014 at 12:21 | history | edited | trichoplax is on Codidact now | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Update on my edit to the linked answer
|
| Oct 5, 2014 at 10:26 | history | edited | trichoplax is on Codidact now | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 18 characters in body
|
| Oct 5, 2014 at 10:15 | answer | added | BESW | timeline score: 15 | |
| Oct 5, 2014 at 9:58 | history | edited | trichoplax is on Codidact now | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| S Oct 5, 2014 at 9:48 | answer | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Oct 5, 2014 at 9:48 | history | asked | trichoplax is on Codidact now | CC BY-SA 3.0 |