Timeline for What level of detail should questions have?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26 at 19:55 | answer | added | JBH | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 25 at 12:11 | answer | added | Ash | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 25 at 10:14 | comment | added | Ash | Sorry I was on hiatus for your question about swords, hit me up in a private chat if you want some thoughts, I do both metallurgy and medieval combat as hobbies. | |
| Aug 24 at 23:36 | answer | added | elemtilas | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 24 at 22:49 | comment | added | elemtilas | (cont) contention or bolster your point, it would be much more helpful to choose questions that a) we can evaluate and b) don't have too many other problems. Given that you're kind of rehashing ancient history with, from my outside perspective, what may or may not actually be what happened to your question, it might simply be best to remove paragraph 4 altogether as the evidence given is so poor. | |
| Aug 24 at 22:44 | comment | added | elemtilas | Nepene Nep's query is an extremely bad example to cite for your question about level of detail. Level of detail wasn't the issue in that case, so much as the query not being about worldbuilding (lack of context), being story based. Other issues revolved around brainstorming and asking for longish lists of things. I'd strongly recommend you pick an example question that actually supports your point! Pretty much the same advice for trying to use a question that is now deleted to support your query. I don't mean to be nit-pciky, but if you wish to bring evidence to support your (cont) | |
| Aug 24 at 18:47 | history | asked | Rhymehouse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |