Timeline for Help Center Upgrade: The Future of Storybuilding
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11 at 23:38 | comment | added | Mermaker | Readies the pen, paper, and merfolk crafting equipment. - Fuck yes, let's do it. It pains me a lot to avoid answering questions that the rules say they are bad but my heart wish nothing else but take part in the creation of that fiction. Let's do it, let's frigging go! | |
| Mar 19 at 20:16 | comment | added | elemtilas | Okay, that's fair. | |
| Mar 19 at 14:18 | comment | added | JBH | @elemtilas The brainstorming statement in the help center came after the HCQ Meta Post. I actually don't know where it came from. I don't remember any community discussion concerning it. Whether you consider brainstorming and HCQs the same/similar or not, HCQs still violate the book rule in every case I've seen. | |
| Mar 18 at 6:34 | comment | added | elemtilas | On the five policy changes: 1 agreed; 2 agreed; 3 agreed; 4 agreed on both parts; 5 deferred. If HCQ and brainstorming are essentially the same, why do we have both concepts? | |
| Mar 18 at 6:28 | comment | added | elemtilas | I think it should be clarified that said story development query must come from within a worldbuilding context. It's one thing for Tolkien to ask us if it makes sense for Frodo to ultimately fail within the context of MIddle Earth; quite another for Clancy to ask us if Ramius's deception makes sense within the context of cold war era Earth. In other words, a good story building question ought to marry narrative and world into a unified whole. | |
| Mar 16 at 3:33 | history | answered | JBH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |