Timeline for We're going to upgrade the Help Center page, here is the 100,000-foot-view discussion of the what-we-cans and what-we-can'ts
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10 at 20:54 | comment | added | Schwern | I notice there's a lot of "we DO NOT accept questions..." but only one "we DO accept questions...". I think we need more positive guidance on what to is good to ask. | |
| Feb 7 at 21:02 | history | edited | JBH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 554 characters in body
|
| Feb 7 at 16:51 | comment | added | Trish | That would be worth a note then - that "TSB" might need a revamp. | |
| Feb 7 at 16:26 | comment | added | VLAZ | Thanks, I was just checking if it was intentional or an accidental omission. | |
| Feb 7 at 16:21 | comment | added | JBH | @VLAZ That's because a landing page listing all our policies doesn't yet exist. At this time policies are considered "in review." Please remember that this first post's intent is to review major divisions on the help center page. To use that page efficiently, we will need to link out to Meta pages that deal with the main section in more detail. | |
| Feb 7 at 16:19 | comment | added | JBH | @Trish I didn't include that in this example intentionally. I expect we'll have a rigorous discussion of what "too story-based" means in the future. Please remember that this first effort is focusing on major divisions (although I'm not surprised that folks want to jump into the details). | |
| Feb 7 at 11:23 | comment | added | VLAZ | "You can find a complete list by clicking here." the link just leads to the main page. Is that intended to be a placeholder for something else? Or is the link wrong? | |
| Feb 7 at 10:28 | comment | added | Trish | Bullet 4: worldbuilding.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/49 - our "too story based" policy. | |
| Feb 6 at 19:18 | history | edited | JBH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 176 characters in body
|
| Feb 6 at 19:17 | comment | added | JBH | @Escapeddentalpatient. I had forgotten all about that post! One of my goals with this is to start linking all the relevant policy posts so we don't have to remember everything. Thanks for bringing that up. | |
| Feb 6 at 19:12 | comment | added | Escaped dental patient. | "We accept real-world questions", caveat, providing there's Worldbuilding context. | |
| Feb 6 at 4:14 | comment | added | JBH | @sphennings I'm sure you're right and maybe raw idea generation should still be off-topic, but that's a discussion for later when we ask ourselves which, if any, of our policies should be modified. Today I'm just using it as a placeholder to exemplify the need for the section. | |
| Feb 6 at 2:17 | comment | added | sphennings | When we removed the custom close option for idea generation all the discussion around removing it was because it was covered by other existing close reasons. Idea generation was still not permitted after the change. | |
| Feb 6 at 0:31 | history | answered | JBH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |