Timeline for Should the hard-science tag be retired?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 23, 2023 at 5:15 | answer | added | Tortliena - inactive | timeline score: 4 | |
Jun 22, 2023 at 22:25 | comment | added | M S | Actually, I retract that suggestion (but I'll leave the comment) since as I stated in my reply I think the largest issue with the tag is answerers/commenters misunderstanding it | |
Jun 22, 2023 at 22:12 | comment | added | M S | Could bringing back the math-based tag solve some of these issues? That way it's possible to specify you want answers to use equations, without having people misunderstand the hard-science tag to mean 'everything within this question aligns with science/reality'. | |
Jun 21, 2023 at 11:11 | comment | added | NotThatGuy | Aside from people who don't know what "hard science" is, I think some people also just wildly overestimate the scientific support for and real-world plausibility of ideas in sci-fi and fantasy. | |
Jun 19, 2023 at 14:49 | answer | added | elemtilas | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 19, 2023 at 0:40 | answer | added | TheDemonLord | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 16, 2023 at 12:58 | answer | added | M S | timeline score: 0 | |
Jun 16, 2023 at 11:06 | answer | added | KeizerHarm | timeline score: 9 | |
Jun 16, 2023 at 2:28 | history | became hot meta post | |||
Jun 15, 2023 at 8:56 | answer | added | JBH | timeline score: 6 | |
Jun 14, 2023 at 17:00 | history | edited | John Dallman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Explained my reasoning better
|
Jun 14, 2023 at 15:32 | answer | added | L.DutchMod | timeline score: 4 | |
Jun 14, 2023 at 15:25 | history | asked | John Dallman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |